Distressed Investor 2023 Conference in New York City.
Artwork by Courtroom Artist Elizabeth Williams
Illustrations below by various presenters
Distressed Investor 2023 Conference in New York City.
Artwork by Courtroom Artist Elizabeth Williams
Illustrations below by various presenters
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/dec/23/courtroom-sketch-artist-donald-trump-sam-bankman-fried
Elizabeth Williams has been sketching since the 1980s – but with Trump, De Niro, Sheeran and Trump again, nothing quite compares to 2023
In 2022, Elizabeth Williams only worked 11 days as a courtroom sketch artist, relying on her other job as an illustrator to pay the bills. This year, work exploded.
Williams has covered these cases since the 1980s, providing sketches for outlets such as the Associated Press and CNN as countless celebrities made their way through New York City’s court system. Just when she thought she’d seen it all, the scene outside Manhattan courts started to resemble a red carpet, with news cameras and paparazzi jostling to get their photo of the many famous faces who stopped by in 2023. Whether it was one of Donald Trump’s numerous appearances or Sam Bankman-Fried’s crypto trial, sketch artists like Williams had no shortage of inspiration as they gave the public a peek at proceedings inside the cameras weren’t privy to.
Robert De Niro, Ed Sheeran and the Real Housewife Jen Shah all passed through New York courts in 2023 – sometimes, two on the same day, which meant that Williams skipped lunch to cover both of them. As the year ends, she’s swimming in sketches. “I might put together a calendar of all these people,” she said. “I’ve got enough Trump sketches to do just a calendar of him in court.”
A lot goes into Williams’s sketches, even if, in some cases, she only has mere minutes to complete them. After all, she’s sketching a first draft of history’s crooks, alleged perps and vindicated VIPs.
FOR ENTIRE STORY CLICK LINK
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/dec/23/courtroom-sketch-artist-donald-trump-sam-bankman-fried
Sam Bankman Fried's demeanor during his trial has shown him to be more and more concerned as the witnesses pile up and the days go on. At the beginning of the trial he appeared focused on his laptop, showing little emotion
Courtroom Sketch of Sam Bankman Fried at the beginning of his trial |
Sketches of Bankman Fried during Gary Wang direct examination |
Then during Wang's cross examination he would write down notes and motion to his attorney so he could give them to him. He had Post it notes all over the place. Sometimes he would fold them in his hands and then fold them again and again until the Post it was a tiny little square.
Courtroom Sketch of Bankman Fried writing on Post it notes, messages for his attorney during cross examination of Gary Wang |
Sketch of Bankman Fried talking to his attorney and handing him one of his many notes. |
Courtroom Drawing of Bankman Fried seated eyes closed hand clasped |
Once he shook his head slightly, then he would stare at his computer screen and at times he would grimace. When Ellison walked in and out of the courtroom there was no eye contact between them.
Sketch of Bankman Fried and Caroline Ellison during her testimony |
Ellison would hold her head down when speaking or when the lawyers were at the sidebar. During those times Bankman Fried would stare into space or look at his computer screen. It was summed up in two words, extreme awkwardness.
Courtroom Sketch of Bankman Fried grimacing during Caroline Ellison's testimony |
More weeks to come for Bankman Fried and his emotional roller coaster will continue.
A federal grand jury indicted a Texas man Thursday who allegedly kidnapped a 13-year-old girl at gunpoint in Texas, drove her to California, and sexually assaulted her multiple times before his arrest in Long Beach last week.
Steven Sablan alleged kidnapper at his arraignment. Artwork by Bill Robles
His arraignment was arraigned on July 31 in the United States District Court in
Los Angeles.
According to the indictment and an affidavit previously
filed with a criminal complaint in this matter, on July 6 in San Antonio, the
victim was walking down a street when Sablan, driving a gray Nissan Sentra,
approached her. Sablan allegedly raised a black handgun to his side and told
the victim to get in the car, saying "If you don't get in the car with me,
I am going to hurt you."
A stranger saw the note, and notified law enforcement and Sablan was arrested.
Leslie Van Houten, a follower of Charles Manson who was convicted in two killings, was released on parole Tuesday, officials said.
Van Houten, 73, spent more than five decades in prison.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who had previously blocked parole efforts, said Friday that he would not challenge Houten's release in state Supreme Court.
An appeals court ruled in May that Van Houten was eligible for parole, reversing a decision by Newsom to reject parole.
Leslie Van Houten testifying on the witness stand during the Manson trial. Artwork by Bill Robles |
Van Houten was originally sentenced to death for the Aug. 10, 1969, murders of Leno and Rosemary La Bianca.
"The original conviction and death sentence were reversed on appeal and she was sentenced to life with the possibility of parole," the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation said in a statement.
In 1969, Manson and fellow cult member Charles “Tex” Watson went inside the couple's home and tied them up.
Manson went outside and told Van Houten and another person to go inside and follow Watson’s directions, according to court records. Watson told them to kill Rosemary LaBianca, and Watson killed Leno LaBianca.
The previous day, Watson and other cult members — not Van Houten — killed actress Sharon Tate and others in her home.
Van Houten is the second of six Manson cult followers convicted of murder and initially sentenced to death to be paroled.
Leslie Van Houten during bail hearing in 2015 by Bill Robles |
Most of the death sentences were commuted to life in prison under a 1972 court decision that outlawed capital punishment; the death penalty was later reinstated in California.
The lawyer who used ChatGPT to help write up an affidavit — and didn't realize the AI had completely made up fake legal cases to cite — said he was "duped" by the tool during a sanctions hearing before a New York judge on Thursday, Inner City Press reported.
But the federal judge in the hearing pressed the lawyer, questioning how the lawyer missed the fakes and saying ChatGPT's fabricated ramblings were "legal gibberish," journalist Matthew Russell Lee reported for his nonprofit outlet.
"Chat GPT wasn't supplementing your research - it was your research, right?" US District Court Judge P. Kevin Castel asked lawyer Steven Schwartz of personal injury law firm Levidow, Levidow & Oberman, according to Inner City Press.
The affidavit used by Schwartz and colleague Peter LoDuca was for a lawsuit from a man who alleged he was hurt by a serving cart on a flight. The court filing included six court cases that were "bogus judicial decisions with bogus quotes and bogus internal citations," Castel wrote in a previous court order.
"You say you verify cases," Castel said, according to Inner City Press
"I, I, I thought there were cases that could not be found on Google," Schwartz replied, according to the outlet.
"Six cases, none found on Google. This non-existent case, Varghese, the excerpt you had was inconsistent, even on the first page," Castel said, the outlet reported. "Can we agree that's legal gibberish?"
Schwartz responded that he thought ChatGPT's output was "excerpts," Inner City Press reported.
Another lawyer at the firm, Peter LoDuca, is also facing sanctions, though he said in court that he didn't do the research that was used in the affidavit.
"I have worked with Mr. Schwartz for 27 years," LoDuca said in court, Inner City Press reported. "I should have been more skeptical. I can't go back and change what was done. This will never happen again."
A collection of the images from the E Jean Carroll trial in consecutive order. From the first day of testimony to the final verdict