Ezekiel Elliott fallout: Roger Goodell keeps on end-zone dancing all over players and they have themselves to blame
Link to entire story. Excerpts below
https://www.yahoo.com/sports/ezekiel-elliott-fallout-roger-goodell-keeps-end-zone-dancing-players-blame-021005497.html
Jeffrey Kessler attorney for the NFL Players Union and Ezekiel Elliot in Manhattan Federal Court. Elliot seated left behind his attorney. Judge Katherine Polk Failla presiding
One by one, lawsuit by lawsuit, decision by decision, NFL
commissioner Roger Goodell is ascending to disciplinary emperor. And in
the wake of the Ezekiel Elliott case, his reign over the players is looking more untouchable than ever.For NFL players and their union, that’s the fallout from Thursday, when a federal appeals court in New York all but guaranteed Elliott will serve his six-game suspension for violating the league’s domestic violence policy. For Goodell and his legal department, the victory comes despite a few judges along the way questioning whether the league’s punitive process is fundamentally fair. It also comes in the face of one of the NFL’s investigators stating her own suspension objections after weighing evidence in the case.
Yet even in the face of those concerns, Goodell has ridden out a litany of legal challenges and prevailed once again, bolstering a nebulous disciplinary process that may never be penetrated.
As it turns out, this NFL emperor not only has clothes, he’s got a legal suit of armor.
The NFLPA gave it to him in the collective-bargaining agreement, and now its players are paying for legal upgrades, too. That’s what is happening with Elliott, whose case may end up damaging the union.
Judge Katherine Polk Failla |
What is left on the docket? The Dallas Cowboys’ star running back will ride out an expedited appeal through the U.S. Court of Appeals in the 2nd Circuit that is set to hear oral arguments on Dec. 1. Unless there is a miraculous revelation, Elliott is likely to lose his appeal. Even with a new panel of judges from the 2nd Circuit, it would be a stunning development to have the court ultimately determine that his appeal arguments were more worthy of a legal win than the simple injunction he was just denied.
And if
(or when) Elliott suffers an appeals loss? His legal team could get
extremely ambitious and attempt to secure a moonshot appearance before
the U.S. Supreme Court, something New England Patriots quarterback Tom
Brady didn’t bother to try in deflate-gate. Getting the highest court in
the land to hear Elliott’s case would be a monumental accomplishment as
it would also be far outside of the norm. The Supreme Court typically
takes cases that either have broad and sweeping implications or require a
resolution for conflicting decisions from lower branches of federal
court. Elliott’s collective-bargaining complaint meets neither standard.
Tom Brady in court 2015 |
Ultimately, that will be three extremely strong pillars holding up Goodell’s power and the NFL’s ability to dictate justice in almost any manner. Each damaging in its own way. Peterson’s case illustrated to the NFL that it has latitude to discipline players as it sees fit; Brady’s case bolstered the league’s reliance on scant (and arguably circumstantial) evidence; and Elliott’s case brought both of those realities together in one legal battle.
The
potentially damaging outcome for players might be even more severe due
to Elliott’s case. For the first time, it showcased that the NFL can
essentially run its own in-house investigation however it wants and
still be protected by federal courts – so long as the league goes
through its own arbitration process, which has also been painted as
rigged. If that doesn’t illustrate the remarkable power that Goodell
holds, nothing does.
No comments:
Post a Comment