At Trial, Arab Bank’s Lawyer Spars With Witness
Link: http://nyti.ms/1qimxXg
For
three days, the former chief of the Israeli military’s Palestinian
Affairs Department delivered important, if a bit dry, testimony in the
terrorism financing trial of Arab Bank in Federal District Court in
Brooklyn.
The
witness, Arieh Spitzen, had highlighted bank records showing Arab Bank
routing payments to people who, he said, were widely known to be
terrorists or members of Hamas.
But
during cross-examination on Thursday, the typically dull dissection of
bank records became lively. Mr. Spitzen was tenacious, while Shand S.
Stephens, a lawyer for Arab Bank, was aggressive — making them
well-matched sparring partners.
The
case is also noteworthy because Arab Bank did not turn over a huge
number of bank records; it said that would have violated financial
privacy laws in some of the countries.
To
“restore the evidentiary balance,” a judge who had handled the case in
2010 ruled that the bank could not explain to the jury why it did not
produce the requested records.
The
bank’s refusal to turn over such records stymied investigative efforts
by Mr. Spitzen, who at several points on the stand referred to his
frustration.
But
Mr. Stephens was able to get across the point that Arab Bank had
produced many documents. He opened his cross-examination by noting that
the 225,000 documents the bank had turned over would reach the height of
a seven-story building. After Mr. Stephens asked if those calculations
were correct, Mr. Spitzen deferred to Mr. Stephens, saying he trusted
him.
“Well, you’re probably one of the few people in America that trusts lawyers,” Mr. Stephens said, to laughter from spectators.
Mr.
Spitzen got his own laughs, when he pointed out that he had not printed
all of these records and had examined them on a computer. “I’m not
using that quantity of paper,” he said. “It’s not good for the
environment.”
No comments:
Post a Comment