At Trial, Arab Bank’s Lawyer Spars With Witness
Link: http://nyti.ms/1qimxXg
For
 three days, the former chief of the Israeli military’s Palestinian 
Affairs Department delivered important, if a bit dry, testimony in the 
terrorism financing trial of Arab Bank in Federal District Court in 
Brooklyn.
The
 witness, Arieh Spitzen, had highlighted bank records showing Arab Bank 
routing payments to people who, he said, were widely known to be 
terrorists or members of Hamas.
But
 during cross-examination on Thursday, the typically dull dissection of 
bank records became lively. Mr. Spitzen was tenacious, while Shand S. 
Stephens, a lawyer for Arab Bank, was aggressive — making them 
well-matched sparring partners.
 The
 case is also noteworthy because Arab Bank did not turn over a huge 
number of bank records; it said that would have violated financial 
privacy laws in some of the countries.
To
 “restore the evidentiary balance,” a judge who had handled the case in 
2010 ruled that the bank could not explain to the jury why it did not 
produce the requested records.
The
 bank’s refusal to turn over such records stymied investigative efforts 
by Mr. Spitzen, who at several points on the stand referred to his 
frustration.
But
 Mr. Stephens was able to get across the point that Arab Bank had 
produced many documents. He opened his cross-examination by noting that 
the 225,000 documents the bank had turned over would reach the height of
 a seven-story building. After Mr. Stephens asked if those calculations 
were correct, Mr. Spitzen deferred to Mr. Stephens, saying he trusted 
him.
“Well, you’re probably one of the few people in America that trusts lawyers,” Mr. Stephens said, to laughter from spectators.
Mr.
 Spitzen got his own laughs, when he pointed out that he had not printed
 all of these records and had examined them on a computer. “I’m not 
using that quantity of paper,” he said. “It’s not good for the 
environment.”

No comments:
Post a Comment